26-09-2023  Tuesday

08 August to 29 December, 2023

Understanding Teaching Practices (Part 1)

Every Tuesday (11:00-13:00), Friday (11:00-13:00)

Venue: Main Building Seminar Room - 217

Coordinator: Dean's Office

Core Course:

Instructors: Dr. Narendra Deshmukh, and Dr. Kalpana Kharade

Credits: 4

17 August to 28 December, 2023

Mathematics Education Research: Themes, Processes, and Sensibilities

Every Tuesday (15:00-17:00), Thursday (11:00-13:00)

Venue: Main Building Seminar Room - 217

Coordinator: Dean's Office

Elective Course:

Instructor: Dr. Shweta Naik

Credits: 4

26Tue

Ph.D. thesis defense seminar by Mr. Charudatta Navare

Date: 26 September, 2023
Time: 14:30 - 16:00

Venue: Main Building Lecture Room - G1

Coordinator: Dean's Office

Candidate Name:

Mr. Charudatta Navare

Ph.D. Thesis Title:

Dominance hierarchy as a hidden value in biology: A critical discourse analysis

Abstract:

In this thesis, I perform a critical discourse analysis of introductory biology textbooks to uncover the hidden ideologies in seemingly innocent scientific concepts. I show how dominance hierarchy pervades descriptions of concepts at various levels of organisation, from cellular functioning to evolutionary history. Dominance hierarchy ranks the components of natural systems from ‘higher ’ to ‘lower’. At the cellular level, the conceptual metaphor of ‘cell as a factory’ projects the societal inequalities onto the cell with the nucleus as the ‘control centre’ and the cytoplasm as the site of manual labour that ‘executes’ the ‘instructions’ received. On the evolutionary level, the conceptual metaphor of the ‘ladder of life’, discarded explicitly, continues shaping the narrative of evolutionary history implicitly. Despite several strands of empirical research challenging these ‘scientific fairy tales’, textbook representations have continued unabated. I, therefore, attempt to understand the allure of the hierarchical representations by tracing their historical and cultural roots and argue that their appeal could lie in their congruence with our theoretical frameworks, gender ideologies, and stratified structures of our societies. The thesis argues for challenging the reinforcement of social hierarchies through scientific discourse.